HOME About Blog Contact Other Projects Petitions Resources Volunteers
ENDORSEMENTS FRANCHISE NEWS & OPINIONS OIL COMPANIES POLLS STORE SUPPORT

Friday, May 05, 2006

Terror-Free Oil

By Joe Kaufman
Front Page Magazine
May 5, 2006
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22335

"We as American citizens can actually boycott Mid East oil.
And the way you do that is you go to a gas station whose company doesn't import the oil."
- Bob Bevelacqua, former U.S. Army Green Beret
August 23, 2005, Fox News Channel

In December of 2001, an e-mail was widely distributed across the internet calling for a boycott of all gas stations that purchase crude oil from the Middle East*. While the e-mail consisted of much emotionally charged language - understandably so, given the proximity to 9/11 - and while some of the information provided was faulty, the point that was being made was a valid one and should be revisited.

The e-mail began: "Nothing is more frustrating to me than the feeling that every time I fill-up the tank, I am sending my money to people who are trying to kill me, my family, and my friends. It turns out that some oil companies import a lot of middle eastern oil and others do not import any. I thought it might be interesting for Americans to know which oil companies are the best to buy their gas from."

The piece then proceeded to list major gasoline companies that import Middle Eastern oil and those that do not or "do not import much." Included on the list of importers were Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Marathon. As stated in the e-mail, for the period of September 1, 2000 through August 31, 2001, the companies ranged from importing just under 118,000,000 barrels to just under 206,000,000.

Included on the list of non-importers were Citgo, Sunoco, Conoco, Sinclair and Phillips (which merged with Conoco in 2002). BP Amoco made the bottom of the list (as a "not much") with just over 62,000,000 barrels. [In later versions of the e-mail, further companies would be listed.]

According to the United States Energy Information Administration (EIA), in its 'Crude Oil Imports From Persian Gulf** 2001' report, Middle Eastern oil was indeed purchased by all of the companies listed in the e-mail as importers. However, many of the "non-importers" were listed as importers, as well. In fact, the only two that did not make the official government list for 2001 were Sunoco and Sinclair. And Chevron, which was listed on the e-mail as "not much," made the top three!

But that was then. With the advent of the War on Terrorism, surely the gasoline companies, especially American-based ones, would begin to recognize and work to rectify this all too important matter. Surely something would be done to curb the amount of Mid East oil these companies import. That's only common sense, but that never happened.

Nearly five years after the tragedy of September 11 th, little has changed. The companies that were importing Middle Eastern oil still are, and the companies that weren't still are not. This is according to the latest information
available from the EIA. And it should be noted that, of the companies that are, BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Marathon and Shell get crude straight from Saudi Arabia - the same Saudi Arabia that produced 15 of the 19 hijackers - the same Saudi Arabia which gives millions to Hamas - the same Saudi Arabia that actively spreads its radical jihadist/Wahhabist ideology throughout the world, including the United States.

Besides Saudi Arabia, a number of other Middle Eastern nations, where oil is imported from, have dubious track records. Information derived from the U.S. State Department's '22 nd annual Report to the Congress on Voting Practices at the United Nations,'
underscores the antipathy towards the United States these nations harbor. The following are facts found within the report:

    • Algeria (where Citgo and Shell get crude oil from), in 2004, out of 79 possible U.N. votes, voted against the United States 63 times.

    • Iraq (BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Marathon and Shell) voted against the U.S. 51 times [and that was even after liberation].

    • Kuwait (ExxonMobil and Marathon) voted against the U.S. 63 times.

    • Libya (Shell) voted against the U.S. 65 times.

    • Oman (BP and ConocoPhillips) voted against the U.S. 64 times.

    • Tunisia (Shell) voted against the U.S. 63 times.

On average these countries voted against the United States, in the year 2004, nearly 78 percent of the time. In the case of Saudi Arabia, it was 81 percent against.

The countries that have been discussed here are more in line ideologically with Iran, which shouts "Death to America," than they are with the United States. In fact, five of the countries mentioned, along with Iran, make up the majority of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which sets the price of crude for the rest of the world, which tells us how much more money we have to spend on gas any given day.

In October of 1973, our dependence on Mid East oil brought us an embargo from the Arab world. The Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), which, at the time, consisted of the Arab members of OPEC plus Bahrain, Egypt and Syria, called for an oil embargo against the West to coincide with the war they were preparing for Israel. This had
a devastating effect on the economy, as America was held hostage to the whim of our "friends." Why wait for a repeat performance, embargo or otherwise?

Of course, this money, at least in part, goes to fund our terrorist enemies, as well, both locally and abroad. It is this never-ending cycle - gasoline for money, money for terrorism - that could ultimately lead to our undoing, if nothing is done to stop it. And this problem is multiplied every second of the day, as we sink more and more of our hard earned dollars into our gas tanks. The question we all have to ask ourselves, when we go to the pumps, is are we willing to fund our own demise? And if we're not, then we have to ask ourselves are we willing to work towards a solution to the problem.

Terror-Free Oil Initiative

The American Center for Democracy (ACD) has developed a new program called the Terror-Free Oil Initiative (TFOI). The
purpose of the program is twofold:
    1. to cut off the flow of money that goes to terrorists and
    2. to decrease America 's dependency on foreign oil.
As stated on the ACD website, "This project is dedicated to encouraging Americans to buy only gasoline that originated from countries that do not export or finance terrorism."

While gasoline companies won't shift their loyalties from Mid East oil overnight, Americans have to start somewhere.
Americans must, once and for all, take a stand and support companies like Sunoco and Sinclair that don't get their
crude from 'the crude.'

So which gas station will you fill up at?


Notes:

* Middle East, as used in this article, includes Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.

** Persian Gulf, as used in this article, includes Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.

Joe Kaufman is the Chairman of Americans Against Hate and the host of The Politics of Terrorism
radio show.

9 Comments:

Blogger Hershblogger said...

It is a problem that oil is fungible, so while I would "likely" patronize a terror free gas station, I could not say "definitely."

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/opinion_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23972_4491622,00.html

1:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oil is a fungible commodity, but when you buy “Terror-Free” oil, you increase market share of the companies that use “Terror-Free” oil, therefore moving the oil industry away from Middle Eastern oil.

2:39 PM  
Blogger nevios said...

Where can you buy terror-free oil in Europe, for example in Germany? There is no Sunoco or Sinclair here. Or maybe they have different names (like Esso=Exxon or Jet=Conoco) ?

6:18 AM  
Blogger shaftedbyoil said...

Remember that oil is bought and sold from a global pool. Even if we didn't buy a drop of oil from the Middle East, we would be affected by what happens there. Our demand puts upward pressure on prices. That benefits the nuclear dabblers in Iran - even though we don't import a drop of oil from Iran.

12:26 AM  
Blogger Ben Baummier said...

Do you sell greedy CEO-free oil too?

9:27 AM  
Blogger TangoDeMilo said...

It appears there is no such thing as "terror free oil" in the U.S. at this time according to Sinclair's response to this station opening.

----------------------------
Sinclair turned down Terror-Free Oil's request to remain a Sinclair station after the group's purchase because of its claim of no foreign oil, Kehlbeck told the Omaha World-Herald.

"We had to deny" the request, Kehlbeck said. "We don't feel comfortable to categorically say 100 percent.

While we don't have any contracts with foreign oil or buy directly from them, we do buy from the Merc. … when it's on the New York Mercantile Exchange, we don't know where it comes from."
http://tinyurl.com/35wco4

10:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Omaha World Herald article does not make sense. We never made a claim of “no foreign oil,” especially since our source, Sinclair, imports some of its oil from Canada. We stated that we would buy oil ONLY from companies that do not IMPORT oil from Persian Gulf. We understand that oil is a fungible commodity and there is a chance that that some ME oil could get mixed in the pipeline. We will do our best by minimizing that chance by purchasing our GAS from companies that do not import ME oil. And what is even more important, our customers’ MONEY will go to companies that do not import ME oil. Our effort may not be perfect, but it is as good as it gets.

7:57 PM  
Blogger TangoDeMilo said...

terror free oil said...

The Omaha World Herald article does not make sense. We never made a claim of “no foreign oil,”

--------------------------
But you are making a claim of "terror free oil" (no ME oil?) which is obvious by the station's name.

Doing a little research I found that it is basically impossible for any oil company or refiner to claim they produce no "terror free oil" in the U.S. under the current oil infrastructure.

The intent could be well meaning but it seems obvious that the name of the station is inaccurate and deceiving.

I would think other retailers or any other person or persons that wanted to dispute your claim of "terror free oil" based on your description of that product (no ME oil) would have little problem doing so.

Maybe a proactive solution to avoid inevitable future problems would be to change the station(s) name to something more accurate?

8:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We will buy gas from companies that do not import oil from the Middle East. Therefore, our customers' money will go to the companies that do not import oil from the Middle East. Therefore, this money will not finance terrorism. So, how is the "Terror-Free " name is "inaccurate " or "deceiving"? We suggest you do some more research before making "inaccurate " and "deceiving" statements.

9:15 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

To post articles on this blog, please e-mail infoatTerrorFreeOil.org
and put "BLOG ACCESS REQUEST" in the subject.

Google
Web TerrorFreeOil.org TerrorFreeOil.blogspot.com
Copyright © TFOI 2006. All rights reserved.     Created by Ardentus     Hosted by Enter.net     E-mail: infoatTerrorFreeOil.org


Terror-Free Oil
Terror-Free Oil
Let's switch our
energy dependence
from the Mideast
to the Midwest
Anti Terror Coalition
Support Denmark
Support Denmark
Support
Funding Evil
ACD
ACD

Google PageRank Checker - Page Rank Calculator
Blog Directory & Search engine
Blogger Find
blog search directory
Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blog Search: The Source for Blogs
Blog Search: The Source for Blogs
Find Blogs in the Blog Directory
Listed in LS Blogs

Technorati

LINKS
The American Center for Democracy and Center for the Study of Corruption & the Rule of Law
America's Truth Forum
American Enterprise Institute
American Future
Americans Against Hate
Ann Coulter
Anti-CAIR
Ariel Center for Policy Research
CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America)
The Center for Advanced Middle East Studies (CAMES)
Committee on the Present Danger
The Counterterrorism Blog
DiaperHead
Faultline USA
Gerard Group International
The Intelligence Summit
International Compliance Association (ICA)
International Security Resources
Internet Haganah
Islam Quest Blog
J-2 Security Holdings
J.C. Brisard Blog
Jihad Watch
Kafir Nation
Little Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
One Jerusalem
Paul Sperry
Phoenix Global Information Systems
The Reality Show
Regime Change Iran
The Religion Of Peace
Richard Miniter
Theme Works
Walid Phares

Dell Coupons